[ExI] young people having less sex

[William Flynn Wallace]

 I think seeing a prostitute would still count as losing your virginity,
where with a sex machine, I probably wouldn’t count it.  ballard

Italy, I think, was the place where some prostitutes were studied.  They
called themselves virgins even though they had given oral sex to thousands
of men.  Saving themselves for marriage, they said.

Some went all the way and had operations to restore their hymens.

Is a dildo a sex machine?  Do you lose your virginity that way?

A smart man would never choose a virgin.  A virgin comes with no
experience, of course, and has to learn from the man, who often did not
trouble himself to learn to please women.  And a virgin will have some
curiosity about other men that an experienced woman would not have.

In fact, marrying a prostitute could be the best idea;  you are not going
to surprise her; you are not going to disappoint her.  She will be able to
teach you.  This is great.

Most men, I am afraid, could not stand the comparison with other men, one
of the virtues of the virgin.  Yeah, you don't want to raise another man's
child, but is that really the issue with virgins?  I think not.

bill w


On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 12:47 AM SR Ballard <sen.otaku at gmail.com> wrote:

> Would “optimal” sex machines count as “getting some”? Probably not any
> more than a prostitute does. However I think seeing a prostitute would
> still count as losing your virginity, where with a sex machine, I probably
> wouldn’t count it.
>
> But yes, I think it would satisfy the physical drive. But I think that it
> might leave the emotional drive unsatisfied, much the same with Johns.
> Depending on the person, perhaps it might become dysfunctional. For example
> we might see people attacking sex robots much the same way people attack
> prostitutes. Which in and of itself is no issue, bust the escalation might
> be.
>
> But that’s just speculation.
>
> SR Ballard
>
> > On Nov 17, 2018, at 11:24 PM, <spike at rainier66.com> <spike at rainier66.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > We discussed the research last week.  Apparently young people all over
> the
> > globe are having less sex.
> >
> > We can easily imagine reasons, but I have a question please.  We don't
> > really have good optimal sex machines yet (oh thank you Keith, I love
> that
> > name) but we are getting there.  It is easily foreseeable that they will
> be
> > with us in less than a decade (cue the voice of John Kennedy, remove the
> > moon business, replace with optimal sex machines.)
> >
> > How will that count?  My intuition tells me it wouldn't or shouldn't
> count
> > as sex at all.  But it would drain the drive, would it not?
> >
> > spike
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > extropy-chat mailing list
> > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20181118/8c623a22/attachment.html>