[ExI] Cold fusion
danust2012 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 11 16:21:26 UTC 2019
Yeah, it seems like a boiler plate sentence too.
Sample my Kindle books at:
> On Jun 11, 2019, at 9:09 AM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com> wrote:
> In other words "please keep our grants going"
> bill w
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:50 AM Dan TheBookMan <danust2012 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> While I’m skeptical of the original cold fusion claim, the Nature piece also had:
>> “Nonetheless, a by-product of our investigations has been to provide new insights into highly hydrided metals and low-energy nuclear reactions, and we contend that there remains much interesting science to be done in this underexplored parameter space.”
>> Sample my Kindle books at:
>>> On Jun 11, 2019, at 4:59 AM, John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Bizarrely Google just announce in Nature the results of a secret 4 year $10,000,000 experimental investigation of cold fusion. Their bottom line conclusion:
>>> "We have yet to yield any evidence of such an effect".
>>> Revisiting the cold case of cold fusion
>>> John K Clark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat