[ExI] Possible seat of consciousness found

[Ben Zaiboc]

Brent, I reckon the reason you're not getting through to anyone here 
(and let's face it, you're not. I've yet to hear a single person say 
"ah, yes, I see what you mean") is that you keep saying things like "You 
represent red things with knowledge that has your redness quality", and 
"What is robot number 3’s knowledge qualitatively like?", but (I think 
I'm right in saying) /nobody has a clue what these phrases actually 
mean/. I certainly don't (your language reminds me of things produced by 
the Post-Modernist Essay Generator), and you show no willingness to try 
to explain, which is why I've given up on participating in these 
pointless discussions. It's not even amusing anymore.

Constantly telling people they're wrong, 'qualia-blind', beside the 
point, or misinterpreting what you say, doesn't actually help. You seem 
to be persisting in 'doing what you always did', and you know what that 
leads to: 'getting what you always got'. Blank incomprehension, in this 
case. I still don't know, after literally years of reading your posts, 
on and off, if that's completely justified, and the correct response, or 
not.

-- 
Ben Zaiboc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20200218/e7d92f1f/attachment.htm>