[ExI] i am software: wasRE: utah: RE: Frank Jackson's brilliant color scientist Mary

Adrian Tymes atymes at gmail.com
Mon Jan 6 22:33:09 UTC 2020


I see orange and cyan there, too.  Also, a rainbow is a gradient, which
your list of words fails to note.  There is also no mention of the sky,
clouds, or arc of the rainbow, nor of the transparency toward one end.

It is said that a picture is worth a thousand words.  Exacttness of that
measure aside, trying to equate a picture to a very few words is a strawman
argument, and as such fails to refute the concept that image qualia can be
represented in other forms.

On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 8:44 AM Brent Allsop via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

>
> Your wrong, unless you see no difference between this
> [image: image.png]
> and the abstract words "red, yellow, green, purple and blue".
>
> Notice how I can redefine the words purple and blue.
> You can't redefine your purpleness, and blueness, it just is, and you know
> that more absolutely than you know anything.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:47 AM spike jones via extropy-chat <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:43 AM John Clark via extropy-chat <
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 4:29 PM Brent Allsop via extropy-chat <
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >>>… *In other words, both (255, 0, 0) and "red" are not physically
>> red.  You need to point to something and say: "THAT is red" to provide a
>> physical definition to those abstract terms. *
>>
>>
>>
>> >>…If you're interested in subjectivity, or in gaining understanding of
>> the most basic fundamental nature of anything, not just consciousness,
>> you've got to forget about definitions because ultimately that always leads
>> to circularity, instead you've got to use examples. You point to a ripe
>> tomato and say "That is  (255, 0, 0), aka pure red". … John K Clark
>>
>>
>>
>> John K Clark
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *…*> *On Behalf Of *William Flynn Wallace via extropy-chat
>> *Subject:* Re: [ExI] utah: RE: Frank Jackson's brilliant color scientist
>> Mary
>>
>>
>>
>> >…I think it's only circular if there is only one example.  bill w
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The entire discussion has helped me accept what I have long suspected: I
>> am a digital avatar.  I “think” only in terms of numbers and equations.
>> You perhaps have heard of that creepy movie where the boy saw dead people,
>> everywhere, walking around.  They didn’t even know they are dead.  Well, I
>> am his digital counterpart: I see simulated people walking around
>> everywhere.  They don’t even know they are software.  I didn’t know I was
>> one until the recent qualia discussion.
>>
>>
>>
>> Be that as it may, I am a really cool avatar.  Self-aware I am!  (Or
>> should it be “it am?”  (It are?  (It be?)))  Of course it be only digitally
>> simulated self-awareness, but that’s better than none at all.
>>
>>
>>
>> spike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20200106/0d23de86/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 128065 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20200106/0d23de86/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list