[ExI] UFOs again

[Henry Rivera]

According to Bob Lazar, who seems more credible than ever, and I just watched the Netflix movie about him, the craft he worked on moved by manipulating gravity and space/time. As I understand it, Element 115 when exposed to radiation generates its own antigravitational field which is then amplified and directionalized (warping space/time?) much as if a bowling ball is placed on a mattress creating a void the craft moves to. 
See below which has clips from the movie:
https://youtu.be/ghkFTRY4ZB0
https://youtu.be/GFhqpTK9Ysc

> On Jul 27, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Stuart LaForge via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> The Pentagon sure chose an odd time to come (relatively) clean about its UFO program. It could be correlated to the creation of the U.S. Space Force.  It could be simply a distraction from the pandemic and riots. But we sure do live in interesting times. :-)
> 
> https://scontent-sjc3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p526x296/115941526_10105926325418338_783423148093303449_o.jpg?_nc_cat=107&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=u0BttLw3snoAX-SxC3i&_nc_ht=scontent-sjc3-1.xx&_nc_tp=6&oh=68b59a04c80a82e76e01785ed859b0ae&oe=5F43E05D
> 
> Here is the declassified video footage:
> Video 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWLZgnmRDs4
> Video 2 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TumprpOwHY
> Video 3 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUrTsrhVce4
> 
> I find one of the most interesting things to occur in the final seconds of the the first video. Twice starting at about 1:10 into the video, the object accelerates fast enough to break the FLIR targeting lock represented by the onscreen reticle. The first time the object does this at about 1:12, the FLIR system, or perhaps the operator, manages to reacquire the target lock, but the second time around 1:13 the targeting system fails to reacquire the object. The most curious aspect is that just at the onset of both velocity boosts, the monitor shows spikes in interference where the screen turns to horizontal lines. Could this be caused by some sort of EMP originating from the object? If so that would suggest some sort of electromagnetic or nuclear drive.
> 
> Here is an article in Popular Mechanics where an astrophysicist who worked for the program said he examined materials more advanced than ours.
> 
> The astrophysicist Eric Davis, who consulted with the Pentagon’s original UFO program and now works for the defense contractor Aerospace Corporation, told the Times that after he examined certain materials, he came to the conclusion that “we couldn’t make [them] ourselves.” In fact, Davis briefed a Department of Defense (DOD) agency as recently as March about retrieving materials from “off-world vehicles not made on this earth.”
> 
> Also a Pentagon spokesperson says, "As we have said previously, the Department of Defense and all of the military departments take any incursions by unauthorized aircraft into our training ranges or designated airspace very seriously, and examine each report,[ . . .]"
> 
> Of note, any experimental vehicle of ours that might have been being tested during the military exercises would have been AUTHORIZED to be in the airspace even if the pilots involved didn't know about them.
> 
> Also there is the fact that the videos had been screened for classified content before being released implying that nothing depicted in the videos is our own, and therefore classified, technology.
> 
> https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a33413777/pentagon-ufo-program-materials-vehicles/
> 
> What do you all think? Chinese, Russian, ball lightening, or ET?
> 
> Stuart LaForge
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20200727/67b0aa8c/attachment-0001.htm>