[ExI] Even India and Haiti do it better
sen.otaku at gmail.com
Fri May 8 02:33:51 UTC 2020
I think “close proximity” is entirely legitimate. It’s like the difference between “nearby” and “really close”.
> On May 7, 2020, at 2:09 PM, William Flynn Wallace via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> Please help me in my frustrating ongling war against redundancies. "Proximity' means 'closeness'. 'Close proximity' is redundant, the equivalent of saying 'close closeness'. Please??? "Share in common' in another one. bill w
>> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 1:59 PM Will Steinberg via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>> Wait spike are you joking about not catching it on top of a train? Confined spaces don't have to be inside. Close proximity should be enough for transfer whether you are inside the train or on top of it. But I couldn't tell if you were being facetious or not
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat