[ExI] why the book is better

[William Flynn Wallace]

>
> > But a film doesn't necessarily have to be worse than a book. If a film
> > comes first ...
>
> Another important factor. Which did you encounter first? The one you're
> more familiar with is often 'better', regardless of whether it's a
> hatchet-job, etc.
>

That has not been my experience.  If I see a movie first and then read the
book, I usually think of several ways in which the movie could have been
better.   Casting, for one thing - the movie having left out significant
parts, for another.  Differences between me and the director/screen
writer.  A movie that was perfectly cast:  Gone With The Wind.  bill w

>
> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20211218/186330d8/attachment.htm>