[ExI] why the book is better
William Flynn Wallace
foozler83 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 18 17:11:10 UTC 2021
> > But a film doesn't necessarily have to be worse than a book. If a film
> > comes first ...
> Another important factor. Which did you encounter first? The one you're
> more familiar with is often 'better', regardless of whether it's a
> hatchet-job, etc.
That has not been my experience. If I see a movie first and then read the
book, I usually think of several ways in which the movie could have been
better. Casting, for one thing - the movie having left out significant
parts, for another. Differences between me and the director/screen
writer. A movie that was perfectly cast: Gone With The Wind. bill w
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat