[ExI] uv as an antiviral

[Stathis Papaioannou]

On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 at 07:27, spike jones via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> From: spike at rainier66.com <spike at rainier66.com>
> Subject: uv as an antiviral
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >...BillK, regarding that UV light business... that's why we call it
> research, rather than refind.  spike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> BillK my apologies for belaboring this point, but I had a new wacky idea.
>
>
>
> Recall that when the mRNA vaccines became available in 2020, other wacky
> lines of research were abandoned.  We had the vaccine, hooray!  But then...
> we found out that C-19 could evolve around that mRNA "vaccine" then we
> found
> out that the "vaccine" doesn't train the T-cells, then we found out
> "immunity" doesn't last very long, then we found out that it doesn't
> necessarily prevent transmission, then we found out it doesn't necessarily
> prevent infection or immunity, then we found out it doesn't necessarily
> prevent hospitalization.
>

Why couldn't they just fix it without all the mucking around? Why not sack
them all and put competent people in their place?

-- 
Stathis Papaioannou
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20221112/881fbd81/attachment.htm>