[ExI] Symbol Grounding

Brent Allsop brent.allsop at gmail.com
Fri Apr 21 20:59:41 UTC 2023


Your model is based on a Naive Realism model.

Here is a representational model which will actually be possible without
magic:

[image: image.png]


On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 5:19 AM Ben Zaiboc via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

> Here is a diagram (because I'm generally a visual person, and can usually
> understand things if I can draw them):
>
>
>
> A very general, high-level and crude diagram that tries to illustrate the
> concept of 'symbol grounding' as I understand it, from these discussions
> we've been having. Plus an arrow representing output of speech or text, or
> anything really, that the system is capable of outputting (obviously
> there's a hell of a lot going on in every single element in the diagram,
> that I'm ignoring for simplicity's sake).
>
> As far as I understand, the 'symbol grounding' occurs between the
> conceptual models (built up from sensory inputs and memories) and the
> language centres (containing linguistic 'tokens', or symbols), as we've
> previously agreed.
>
> There are two arrows here because the models can be based on or include
> data from the language centres as well as from the environment. The symbols
> (tokens) in the language centres represent, and are 'grounded in', the
> conceptual models (these are the object and action models I've discussed
> earlier, and likely other types of models, too, and would include a
> 'self-model' if the system has one, linked to the token "I").
>
> The sensory inputs are of various modalities like vision, sounds, text,
> and so-on (whatever the system's sensors are capable of perceiving and
> encoding), and of course will be processed in a variety of ways to extract
> 'features' and combine them in various ways, etc.
>
> I didn't include something to represent Memory, to keep things as simple
> as possible.
>
> So, could we say that this diagram illustrates, in a very general way,
> what's going on in a human? in a LLM AI? Both? Neither?
>
> Would you say it's broadly correct, or missing something, or incorrect in
> another way?
>
> Ben
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230421/0968a094/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 8vllDMs5s2lJQuKB.png
Type: image/png
Size: 44150 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230421/0968a094/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 41220 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230421/0968a094/attachment-0003.png>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list