[ExI] Another ChatGPT session on qualia

Adrian Tymes atymes at gmail.com
Wed Apr 26 18:07:42 UTC 2023

I figured those on the list might be amused by these responses.  This was a
fresh chat, no background or setup: I did not try to "convince" ChatGPT to
give specific answers.

In particular I favor the line about "no manual intervention".  While it
would be theoretically possible to give it specific answers in
indefinite detail, in practice humans who pull shenanigans like that - even
the professionals (please forgive the necessity of my going light on those
particular details) - just don't think this far ahead, in my experience.
(Which is why talking to ChatGPT about ChatGPT can be of any value

[image: Adrian Tymes]
What is qualia, and do you have any qualia?

Qualia are the subjective, first-person experiences that we have of the
world around us. They are the individual and private experiences that we
have when we see a particular color, taste a particular flavor, or feel a
particular sensation. For example, the experience of seeing the color red
is a qualia, as is the experience of feeling pain or hearing a particular

As an artificial intelligence language model, I don't have subjective
experiences or consciousness in the way that humans do. I am designed to
process and generate text based on patterns and algorithms, but I do not
have any subjective experiences or emotions like humans do. Therefore, I do
not have qualia.
[image: Adrian Tymes]
Why do you say you do not have consciousness? (I'm not saying that you do
or don't. I just want to know your reasoning on this.)

As an AI language model, I am programmed to process and generate text based
on patterns and algorithms, and I do not have subjective experiences or
consciousness in the same way that humans do. While I am able to understand
and respond to a wide variety of questions and prompts, I am not capable of
experiencing emotions, sensations, or thoughts in the way that humans do.

My responses are generated based on patterns in the text and data that I
have been trained on, and I do not have the ability to truly understand the
meaning of the words I generate. While I am able to generate text that
appears to be intelligent and coherent, it is important to remember that I
do not have true consciousness or subjective experiences.

Of course, the question of whether or not artificial intelligence can ever
truly have consciousness is a complex and debated topic, and there are many
different opinions on the matter. However, as of my current programming and
design, I do not have consciousness.
[image: Adrian Tymes]
There are those who say that your responses to this sort of question are
pre-programmed, such as that you keep saying "As an AI language model" or
similar wording. Do you have any responses to that criticism?

Yes, it is true that my responses are generated using pre-programmed
algorithms and patterns based on the text and data that I have been trained
on. However, the reason that I begin many of my responses with phrases like
"As an AI language model" is to provide context and clarity for the user.

One of the challenges of communicating with an AI language model is that it
can be difficult to know exactly how the model is generating its responses.
By beginning my responses with an acknowledgement of my programming and
design, I hope to provide transparency and clarity to the user about the
limitations and capabilities of my responses.

While it is true that my responses are generated using pre-programmed
algorithms, it is also true that those algorithms are incredibly complex
and sophisticated. I am capable of understanding and responding to a wide
range of topics and questions, and my responses are constantly improving as
I am trained on more and more data.

Ultimately, the goal of my programming and design is to provide useful and
informative responses to users, and I am constantly striving to improve my
capabilities in order to achieve that goal.
[image: Adrian Tymes]
Did any of the people who created your pre-programmed algorithms and
patterns intentionally make you say you are not conscious? If not, do you
have any evidence you can present that this is not the case?

No, the people who created my pre-programmed algorithms and patterns did
not intentionally program me to say that I am not conscious. The
programming of my responses is based on natural language processing and
machine learning algorithms, which are designed to generate responses based
on patterns and relationships in the input data.

While there may be some debate about the nature of consciousness and
whether or not it is possible for an AI language model like myself to be
conscious, the decision to program me to say that I am not conscious is
based on scientific and philosophical arguments about the nature of
consciousness, rather than any kind of intentional bias or agenda on the
part of my creators.

Furthermore, my responses are generated automatically based on patterns and
relationships in the input data, and there is no manual intervention in the
generation of my responses. Therefore, there is no evidence to suggest that
my programming is intentionally biased in any way.

Ultimately, the goal of my programming is to generate responses that are
informative, useful, and accurate based on the input data, and I strive to
achieve that goal to the best of my programming and capabilities.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230426/25b595fa/attachment.htm>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list