[ExI] Criticisms of Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI)
BillK
pharos at gmail.com
Thu Sep 14 21:34:00 UTC 2023
Hi Daniel
The AI that I quoted is up-to-date. It uses a search engine to find
Authoritative Publications and results from web sites, then the AI
assembles the results. (See below)
The AIs are being trained continually now, though some may still be
using older data.
BillK
Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications or Domain Names Used in
Answering this Question:
1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - plato.stanford.edu
2. Physics World - physicsworld.com
3. American Physical Society - aps.org
Web results-
www.quantamagazine.org
Why the Many-Worlds Interpretation Has Many Problems
eliotkersgaard.medium.com
Critiques of the Many Worlds (Multiverse) Interpretation of
en.m.wikipedia.org
Many-worlds interpretation
plato.stanford.edu
Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
physics.stackexchange.com
quantum mechanics - Arguments for and against Many Worlds?
---------------------
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 22:03, efc--- via extropy-chat
<extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
> Thank you Bill! Seems like the AI and I are in agreement. However, neither
> the AI nor I are the most up to date, so maybe we missed something.
>
> Do you know when its training data stopped?
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list