[ExI] Criticisms of Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI)

[efc at swisscows.email]

Wow, that's really nice that it can spit out the sources! Is this 
available for free for students?

I've just started to teach a new class of future devops engineers, and of 
course chat gpt is a topic, but an AI that also spits out the sources 
seems way better for learning than one that doesn't.

Best regards,
Daniel


On Thu, 14 Sep 2023, BillK via extropy-chat wrote:

> Hi Daniel
> The AI that I quoted is up-to-date. It uses a search engine to find
> Authoritative Publications and results from web sites, then the AI
> assembles the results.  (See below)
> The AIs are being trained continually now, though some may still be
> using older data.
> BillK
>
> Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications or Domain Names Used in
> Answering this Question:
> 1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - plato.stanford.edu
> 2. Physics World - physicsworld.com
> 3. American Physical Society - aps.org
>
> Web results-
> www.quantamagazine.org
> Why the Many-Worlds Interpretation Has Many Problems
>
> eliotkersgaard.medium.com
> Critiques of the Many Worlds (Multiverse) Interpretation of
>
> en.m.wikipedia.org
> Many-worlds interpretation
>
> plato.stanford.edu
> Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
>
> physics.stackexchange.com
> quantum mechanics - Arguments for and against Many Worlds?
> ---------------------
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 22:03, efc--- via extropy-chat
> <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Bill! Seems like the AI and I are in agreement. However, neither
>> the AI nor I are the most up to date, so maybe we missed something.
>>
>> Do you know when its training data stopped?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Daniel
>> _______________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>