[ExI] Is Unprovable Physics Philosophy?

[Darin Sunley]

"Philosophy's just math sans rigor, sense, and practicality · And math's
just physics unconstrained by precepts of reality..."

Related: "As Pratchett said, geography's just physics slowed with trees on
top"

On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:33 PM Giulio Prisco via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

> I totally agree and I would go further: philosophy IS unprovable physics.
>
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:25 PM BillK via extropy-chat
> <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> >
> > Is Unprovable Physics Philosophy?
> > BillK
> >
> > Ask an AI -
> >
> > Unprovable Physics and Philosophy
> >
> > The question of whether unprovable physics is philosophy is a complex
> > and nuanced one. It involves the intersection of two distinct fields -
> > physics and philosophy. To address this question comprehensively, it
> > is important to understand the nature of unprovable physics and its
> > relationship to philosophy.
> >
> > Unprovable Physics
> >
> > In the realm of physics, there are concepts and theories that are
> > difficult or even impossible to prove empirically. These may include
> > ideas related to the fundamental nature of the universe, such as the
> > existence of parallel universes, the behavior of matter at the
> > singularity of a black hole, or the ultimate fate of the cosmos. These
> > concepts often lie at the edge of our current understanding and may be
> > beyond the reach of experimental verification with existing
> > technology.
> >
> > One example is the concept of string theory, which proposes that
> > fundamental particles are not point-like but instead tiny, vibrating
> > strings. String theory has been influential in theoretical physics but
> > has yet to be confirmed through direct experimentation due to its
> > predictions being difficult to test with current technology.
> >
> > Philosophy
> >
> > Philosophy, on the other hand, deals with fundamental questions about
> > existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. It involves
> > critical thinking and rational inquiry into these areas without
> > necessarily relying on empirical evidence. Philosophical inquiry often
> > delves into areas that are beyond the scope of empirical science and
> > seeks to understand concepts at a more abstract or conceptual level.
> >
> > Intersection of Unprovable Physics and Philosophy
> >
> > When considering unprovable physics, it becomes apparent that certain
> > concepts may overlap with philosophical inquiries. The inability to
> > empirically verify certain aspects of physics can lead to discussions
> > that resemble philosophical debates. For example, discussions about
> > the multiverse hypothesis or the nature of time in relation to
> > cosmological models can involve elements of both physics and
> > philosophy.
> >
> > In some cases, physicists may turn to philosophical reasoning when
> > grappling with unprovable aspects of their theories. This can involve
> > considerations about the nature of reality, the limits of scientific
> > knowledge, and the implications of different theoretical frameworks.
> > Similarly, philosophers may engage with unprovable physics by
> > examining its conceptual foundations and implications for broader
> > philosophical questions.
> >
> > Conclusion
> >
> > In conclusion, while unprovable physics and philosophy are distinct
> > disciplines, there is an intersection where they can inform each
> > other. Unprovable physics may raise philosophical questions about the
> > nature of reality and our understanding of it. However, it is
> > important to recognize that while there may be overlap, unprovable
> > physics remains primarily within the domain of scientific inquiry,
> > whereas philosophy operates in its own distinct sphere.
> >
> > Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used:
> >
> > Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: The Stanford Encyclopedia of
> > Philosophy is a comprehensive online resource known for its
> > peer-reviewed articles on various philosophical topics. It provides
> > in-depth analyses and discussions on complex philosophical issues.
> >
> > Physics Today: Physics Today is a respected publication that covers a
> > wide range of topics in physics. It features articles written by
> > experts in the field and provides insights into current developments
> > and debates within physics.
> >
> > The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science: This journal
> > publishes high-quality articles on the philosophy of science,
> > including discussions on the intersection between physics and
> > philosophy. It is a reputable source for scholarly work in this area.
> >
> > These sources were instrumental in providing authoritative information
> > on both unprovable physics and its relationship to philosophy.
> >
> > Philosophers want to know why physicists believe theories they can’t
> prove
> > <
> https://qz.com/590406/philosophers-want-to-know-why-physicists-believe-theories-they-cant-prove
> >
> >
> > Some Important Truths Are Scientifically Unprovable
> > <
> https://johnmccone.com/2019/03/29/some-important-truths-are-scientifically-unprovable/
> >
> > --------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > extropy-chat mailing list
> > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20240209/ec8655cc/attachment.htm>