[ExI] Is Unprovable Physics Philosophy?
Jason Resch
jasonresch at gmail.com
Fri Feb 9 19:58:32 UTC 2024
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024, 12:23 PM Darin Sunley via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> "Philosophy's just math sans rigor, sense, and practicality · And math's
> just physics unconstrained by precepts of reality..."
>
> Related: "As Pratchett said, geography's just physics slowed with trees on
> top"
>
And if anything like Tegmark's mathematical universe hypothesis is true,
physics is just the local geography of mathematics.
Jason
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:33 PM Giulio Prisco via extropy-chat <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>> I totally agree and I would go further: philosophy IS unprovable physics.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:25 PM BillK via extropy-chat
>> <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Is Unprovable Physics Philosophy?
>> > BillK
>> >
>> > Ask an AI -
>> >
>> > Unprovable Physics and Philosophy
>> >
>> > The question of whether unprovable physics is philosophy is a complex
>> > and nuanced one. It involves the intersection of two distinct fields -
>> > physics and philosophy. To address this question comprehensively, it
>> > is important to understand the nature of unprovable physics and its
>> > relationship to philosophy.
>> >
>> > Unprovable Physics
>> >
>> > In the realm of physics, there are concepts and theories that are
>> > difficult or even impossible to prove empirically. These may include
>> > ideas related to the fundamental nature of the universe, such as the
>> > existence of parallel universes, the behavior of matter at the
>> > singularity of a black hole, or the ultimate fate of the cosmos. These
>> > concepts often lie at the edge of our current understanding and may be
>> > beyond the reach of experimental verification with existing
>> > technology.
>> >
>> > One example is the concept of string theory, which proposes that
>> > fundamental particles are not point-like but instead tiny, vibrating
>> > strings. String theory has been influential in theoretical physics but
>> > has yet to be confirmed through direct experimentation due to its
>> > predictions being difficult to test with current technology.
>> >
>> > Philosophy
>> >
>> > Philosophy, on the other hand, deals with fundamental questions about
>> > existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. It involves
>> > critical thinking and rational inquiry into these areas without
>> > necessarily relying on empirical evidence. Philosophical inquiry often
>> > delves into areas that are beyond the scope of empirical science and
>> > seeks to understand concepts at a more abstract or conceptual level.
>> >
>> > Intersection of Unprovable Physics and Philosophy
>> >
>> > When considering unprovable physics, it becomes apparent that certain
>> > concepts may overlap with philosophical inquiries. The inability to
>> > empirically verify certain aspects of physics can lead to discussions
>> > that resemble philosophical debates. For example, discussions about
>> > the multiverse hypothesis or the nature of time in relation to
>> > cosmological models can involve elements of both physics and
>> > philosophy.
>> >
>> > In some cases, physicists may turn to philosophical reasoning when
>> > grappling with unprovable aspects of their theories. This can involve
>> > considerations about the nature of reality, the limits of scientific
>> > knowledge, and the implications of different theoretical frameworks.
>> > Similarly, philosophers may engage with unprovable physics by
>> > examining its conceptual foundations and implications for broader
>> > philosophical questions.
>> >
>> > Conclusion
>> >
>> > In conclusion, while unprovable physics and philosophy are distinct
>> > disciplines, there is an intersection where they can inform each
>> > other. Unprovable physics may raise philosophical questions about the
>> > nature of reality and our understanding of it. However, it is
>> > important to recognize that while there may be overlap, unprovable
>> > physics remains primarily within the domain of scientific inquiry,
>> > whereas philosophy operates in its own distinct sphere.
>> >
>> > Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used:
>> >
>> > Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: The Stanford Encyclopedia of
>> > Philosophy is a comprehensive online resource known for its
>> > peer-reviewed articles on various philosophical topics. It provides
>> > in-depth analyses and discussions on complex philosophical issues.
>> >
>> > Physics Today: Physics Today is a respected publication that covers a
>> > wide range of topics in physics. It features articles written by
>> > experts in the field and provides insights into current developments
>> > and debates within physics.
>> >
>> > The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science: This journal
>> > publishes high-quality articles on the philosophy of science,
>> > including discussions on the intersection between physics and
>> > philosophy. It is a reputable source for scholarly work in this area.
>> >
>> > These sources were instrumental in providing authoritative information
>> > on both unprovable physics and its relationship to philosophy.
>> >
>> > Philosophers want to know why physicists believe theories they can’t
>> prove
>> > <
>> https://qz.com/590406/philosophers-want-to-know-why-physicists-believe-theories-they-cant-prove
>> >
>> >
>> > Some Important Truths Are Scientifically Unprovable
>> > <
>> https://johnmccone.com/2019/03/29/some-important-truths-are-scientifically-unprovable/
>> >
>> > --------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > extropy-chat mailing list
>> > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20240209/24e8c452/attachment.htm>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list