[ExI] Is Unprovable Physics Philosophy?

Fri Feb 9 22:47:30 UTC 2024

Hey Jason - are you a Terry Pratchett fan?  I TP - have read all his books
more than once.   bill w

On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 2:00 PM Jason Resch via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2024, 12:23 PM Darin Sunley via extropy-chat <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>> "Philosophy's just math sans rigor, sense, and practicality · And math's
>> just physics unconstrained by precepts of reality..."
>>
>> Related: "As Pratchett said, geography's just physics slowed with trees
>> on top"
>>
>
> And if anything like Tegmark's mathematical universe hypothesis is true,
> physics is just the local geography of mathematics.
>
> Jason
>
>
>
>> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:33 PM Giulio Prisco via extropy-chat <
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I totally agree and I would go further: philosophy IS unprovable physics.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:25 PM BillK via extropy-chat
>>> <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Is Unprovable Physics Philosophy?
>>> > BillK
>>> >
>>> > Ask an AI -
>>> >
>>> > Unprovable Physics and Philosophy
>>> >
>>> > The question of whether unprovable physics is philosophy is a complex
>>> > and nuanced one. It involves the intersection of two distinct fields -
>>> > physics and philosophy. To address this question comprehensively, it
>>> > is important to understand the nature of unprovable physics and its
>>> > relationship to philosophy.
>>> >
>>> > Unprovable Physics
>>> >
>>> > In the realm of physics, there are concepts and theories that are
>>> > difficult or even impossible to prove empirically. These may include
>>> > ideas related to the fundamental nature of the universe, such as the
>>> > existence of parallel universes, the behavior of matter at the
>>> > singularity of a black hole, or the ultimate fate of the cosmos. These
>>> > concepts often lie at the edge of our current understanding and may be
>>> > beyond the reach of experimental verification with existing
>>> > technology.
>>> >
>>> > One example is the concept of string theory, which proposes that
>>> > fundamental particles are not point-like but instead tiny, vibrating
>>> > strings. String theory has been influential in theoretical physics but
>>> > has yet to be confirmed through direct experimentation due to its
>>> > predictions being difficult to test with current technology.
>>> >
>>> > Philosophy
>>> >
>>> > Philosophy, on the other hand, deals with fundamental questions about
>>> > existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. It involves
>>> > critical thinking and rational inquiry into these areas without
>>> > necessarily relying on empirical evidence. Philosophical inquiry often
>>> > delves into areas that are beyond the scope of empirical science and
>>> > seeks to understand concepts at a more abstract or conceptual level.
>>> >
>>> > Intersection of Unprovable Physics and Philosophy
>>> >
>>> > When considering unprovable physics, it becomes apparent that certain
>>> > concepts may overlap with philosophical inquiries. The inability to
>>> > empirically verify certain aspects of physics can lead to discussions
>>> > that resemble philosophical debates. For example, discussions about
>>> > the multiverse hypothesis or the nature of time in relation to
>>> > cosmological models can involve elements of both physics and
>>> > philosophy.
>>> >
>>> > In some cases, physicists may turn to philosophical reasoning when
>>> > grappling with unprovable aspects of their theories. This can involve
>>> > considerations about the nature of reality, the limits of scientific
>>> > knowledge, and the implications of different theoretical frameworks.
>>> > Similarly, philosophers may engage with unprovable physics by
>>> > examining its conceptual foundations and implications for broader
>>> > philosophical questions.
>>> >
>>> > Conclusion
>>> >
>>> > In conclusion, while unprovable physics and philosophy are distinct
>>> > disciplines, there is an intersection where they can inform each
>>> > other. Unprovable physics may raise philosophical questions about the
>>> > nature of reality and our understanding of it. However, it is
>>> > important to recognize that while there may be overlap, unprovable
>>> > physics remains primarily within the domain of scientific inquiry,
>>> > whereas philosophy operates in its own distinct sphere.
>>> >
>>> > Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used:
>>> >
>>> > Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: The Stanford Encyclopedia of
>>> > Philosophy is a comprehensive online resource known for its
>>> > peer-reviewed articles on various philosophical topics. It provides
>>> > in-depth analyses and discussions on complex philosophical issues.
>>> >
>>> > Physics Today: Physics Today is a respected publication that covers a
>>> > wide range of topics in physics. It features articles written by
>>> > experts in the field and provides insights into current developments
>>> > and debates within physics.
>>> >
>>> > The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science: This journal
>>> > publishes high-quality articles on the philosophy of science,
>>> > including discussions on the intersection between physics and
>>> > philosophy. It is a reputable source for scholarly work in this area.
>>> >
>>> > These sources were instrumental in providing authoritative information
>>> > on both unprovable physics and its relationship to philosophy.
>>> >
>>> > Philosophers want to know why physicists believe theories they can’t
>>> prove
>>> > <
>>> https://qz.com/590406/philosophers-want-to-know-why-physicists-believe-theories-they-cant-prove
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Some Important Truths Are Scientifically Unprovable
>>> > <
>>> https://johnmccone.com/2019/03/29/some-important-truths-are-scientifically-unprovable/
>>> >
>>> > --------------
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > extropy-chat mailing list
>>> > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>>> > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> extropy-chat mailing list
>>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20240209/8d8a7666/attachment-0001.htm>