[ExI] Google’s Willow Quantum Chip: Proof of the Multiverse?
Adrian Tymes
atymes at gmail.com
Wed Nov 12 20:32:16 UTC 2025
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 2:06 PM Jason Resch via extropy-chat
<extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025, 1:29 PM Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>> If you start a conversation with AI with such assertions, the AI's
>> answer will generally agree with such assertions. This does not help
>> determine whether the assertions are true.
>
> Regardless of an initial bias, the AI used similar descriptions as I did, e.g. using the term "conspiratorial." Such a description was not provided by Bill, the AI thought that was the best term to use to describe what the theory implies.
>
> Given that, do you consider my issues with superdeterminism to be idiosyncratic? Or do you now see that this is a common critique people give for rejecting superdeterminism?
Given that you're either missing or ignoring my point again, I think
it is time to end this branch of the discussion, as I did earlier with
another poster. You're not convincing me, and I'm not convincing you.
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list