[ExI] Google’s Willow Quantum Chip: Proof of the Multiverse?

[Jason Resch]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2025, 3:33 PM Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 2:06 PM Jason Resch via extropy-chat
> <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2025, 1:29 PM Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> >> If you start a conversation with AI with such assertions, the AI's
> >> answer will generally agree with such assertions.  This does not help
> >> determine whether the assertions are true.
> >
> > Regardless of an initial bias, the AI used similar descriptions as I
> did, e.g. using the term "conspiratorial." Such a description was not
> provided by Bill, the AI thought that was the best term to use to describe
> what the theory implies.
> >
> > Given that, do you consider my issues with superdeterminism to be
> idiosyncratic? Or do you now see that this is a common critique people give
> for rejecting superdeterminism?
>
> Given that you're either missing or ignoring my point again, I think
> it is time to end this branch of the discussion, as I did earlier with
> another poster.  You're not convincing me, and I'm not convincing you.
>

Note: I am not trying to convince you I am right.

I only seek to settle the question of whether you think I am alone in
raising this particular critique, or if you will acknowledge that this is a
common (if not the main) critique that is leveled against superdeterminism.

If you acknowledge that I am not alone in my thinking, then I at least can
rest easy with the knowledge that you don't think I was crazy for raising
the point I raised (or at least, if I am crazy, that I am in some good
company).

Jason
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20251112/964b2671/attachment.htm>