[ExI] Gender-Neutral Side Note

[Adrian Tymes]

On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 5:53 PM <spike at rainier66.com> wrote:
> From: extropy-chat <extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat
> Maybe link him to documentation that Trump was convicted, what he was convicted of, et al?
>
> I have all that Adrian. The existing documentation tells me about a record-keeping violation, which is a misdemeanor.  To be a felony requires a second crime, which requires a conviction.  Link me to that second conviction please Adrian.  Without a second conviction, there is no second crime, and there isn’t even a first one: the record-keeping violation was well past its five year expiration.

The rest of us look at the documentation and see that the courts said
he was guilty of felonies, full stop.

"But it was just record-keeping" is irrelevant.  If the court says it
found him guilty of felonies, then it found him guilty of felonies.

Now, whether it properly did so - whether, perhaps, the crimes he was
found guilty of should not have been counted as felonies, or whether
there was other critical information that should have made him be
found not guilty - is a matter for the appeals courts.  IIRC, the case
is being appealed.  But that the court did convict him is a matter of
historical record, regardless of what you think should logically have
happened or whether you think it makes any sense whatsoever.