[ExI]  Google’s Willow Quantum Chip: Proof of the Multiverse?
    John Clark 
    johnkclark at gmail.com
       
    Sun Oct 12 17:12:00 UTC 2025
    
    
  
On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 10:43 AM Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
* > I find superdeterminism to be simpler than MWI and the
> other explanations, which - to me -says that Occam's Razor points
> toward superdeterminism.*
>
*Occam's Razor is about an economy of assumptions not an economy of
results. The existence of many worlds is not an assumption, they are a
result, and only  2 assumptions are needed to produce them:  *
*1) Schrodinger's Equation means what it says (and it says nothing about a
wave function collapsing). *
*2) Things that are capable of making an "observation" obey the same
fundamental laws of physics as things that are incapable of doing so. *
*Many Worlds is not picky about initial conditions, an astronomical number
to an astronomical power of them will work just fine, and an infinite
number will too; but superdeterminism will only work if the universe
started out in one and only one particular initial condition, one that
results in a universe that is always lying to us and is always making fools
out of experimenters. *
*John K Clark*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20251012/aea92187/attachment.htm>
    
    
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list