[ExI] Why AI agents invent their own language if you let them chat.

[Keith Henson]

I get Science, so I read it before John posted.

Near as I could see, the article was reporting findings. The tone was more
of astonishment or amusement than pushing any view.

Keith


On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 9:50 AM Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 12:32 PM John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 11:58 AM Adrian Tymes <atymes at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Yes, you can't be responsible for what other people write, and bad on
> >> them for feeding into this hype. I'm asking that you be responsible for
> what you give extra signal to.
> >
> > I promise you this, in the future I will give ONE HELL OF A LOT MORE
> attention to what the journal SCIENCE has to say than what you have to say!
>
> The journal made the same mistake you made.
>
> Science journalists are science journalists.  I individually can't
> talk them down that readily.  Anything I said to them would get
> ignored regardless of its truth.
>
> I can, however, speak to you.  You have known, in the past, that
> appeals to authority are logical fallacies.  "Respected journal" is
> one such authority.
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20261006/2329547b/attachment.htm>