[Paleopsych] Eureka: Study explains spatial orientation differences between sexes
Premise Checker
checker at panix.com
Sat Aug 7 15:48:44 UTC 2004
Study explains spatial orientation differences between sexes
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2004-08/uot-ses080404.php
4.8.4
Contact: Luc Tremblay
[2]luc.tremblay at utoronto.ca
416-946-0200
[3]University of Toronto
Study explains spatial orientation differences between sexes
Inner ear size may be determinant
A University of Toronto researcher has found that differences between
men and women in determining spatial orientation may be the result of
inner ear size.
The study, published online in the journal Perception, examined
whether differences in how men and women judge how we orient ourselves
in our environment could be attributed to physiological or
psychological causes. It found that giving the participants verbal
instructions on how to determine their spatial orientation did not
eliminate the differences between the sexes.
"Since the instructions didn't remove the difference between how men
and women judge spatial orientation, we believe it is likely a result
of physiological differences," says Luc Tremblay, a professor in U of
T's Faculty of Physical Education and Health. For example, says
Tremblay, the otoliths structures found in the inner ear which are
sensitive to inertial forces such as gravity tend to be larger in men
than in women, and may allow males to adjust themselves more
accurately than females in some environments.
In the study, Tremblay asked 24 people (11 males and 13 females) to
point a laser straight-ahead (perpendicular to the body orientation)
while upright and when tilted 45 degrees backward. To test whether
cognitive processes affected spatial orientation, participants who
were tested in the dark were told to focus on external or internal
cues to help them orient the laser. He found that although
instructions to pay attention to internal cues helped women to point
the laser significantly closer to their straight-ahead, there were
still significant differences between the sexes, with women tending to
look more towards their feet.
However, although women are more likely than males to misjudge what is
horizontal when performing tasks in sensory-deprived or biased
environments, they may have an advantage over men while performing
tasks under other sensory conditions, such as driving a car or
piloting a plane, says Tremblay.
This could mean that women are better than males in avoiding the
worst-case scenario in spatial orientation, as women act more
cautiously due to the way they interpret the sensory input, while men
tend to take risks. An example, says Tremblay, is piloting a plane in
a situation where visual cues have been lost. "Because women tend to
judge their horizontal a few degrees below what it actually is, they
tend to pull up to compensate, thus directing the plane away from the
ground."
Tremblay says his finding has good potential for practical
applications such as designing gender-specific training for extreme
situations such as piloting and space flight. "It's important to
identify how men and women differ with respect to complex
perceptual-motor behaviour in order to design recreational,
rehabilitation and work environments that ensure safety and top
performance."
###
This study was published online on March 19, 2004. The research was
supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council of Canada, a Canada Research Chair awarded to Digby
Elliott, one of the paper's co-authors, and a scholarship from Les
Fonds pour la Formation des Chercheurs et l'Aide à la Recherche du
Québec awarded to Tremblay.
CONTACT:
Luc Tremblay
Assistant Professor
U of T Faculty of Physical Education and Health
[4]luc.tremblay at utoronto.ca
416-946-0200
Lanna Crucefix
Public Relations Manager
U of T Faculty of Physical Education and Health
[5]lanna.crucefix at utoronto.ca
416-946-5125
References
2. mailto:luc.tremblay at utoronto.ca
3. http://www.utoronto.ca/
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list