[Paleopsych] CBC: None Dare Call It Cloning by Wesley J. Smith
Premise Checker
checker at panix.com
Fri Aug 13 15:12:03 UTC 2004
None Dare Call It Cloning by Wesley J. Smith
Center for Bioethics and Culture Newsletter
http://www.thecbc.org/enewsletter/index.html
4.8.13
"British scientists have been given permission to
perform therapeutic cloning using human embryos for the first time,"
reported the August 11, 2004, BBC News. What a remarkable statement.
Not the fact that the UK will permit researchers to create human
cloned embryos-that has been on the drawing board for some time. What
made this report so startling was that the British government,
researchers, and the BBC admit that the scientists will be "cloning
human embryos" via "the same technique used to create Dolly the cloned
sheep." (This is known as somatic cell nuclear transfer, or SCNT.)
Just try and get American cloning advocates and their accomplices in
the media to be as candid. On this side of the Atlantic, the C-word is
now reserved for "reproductive cloning," that is SCNT intended to
result in the birth of a cloned baby. But the exact same procedure
used to create cloned embryos for use in research, is never called
cloning anymore. Nor, do advocates usually admit the biological fact
that the "product" of human SCNT is a cloned human embryo. Instead, in
an act of utter cynicism, pro-cloners employ obfuscating words,
redefined terms, and misleading slogans designed to sow confusion in
the minds of the American people.
Here are just two recent examples:
Ron Reagan's speech at the Democrat Convention: Ron Reagan's speech,
which he claimed to be about embryonic stem cell research (ESCR),
actually touted therapeutic cloning, that is, the creation of cloned
embryos for use in research and treatments. Not only did Reagan
incorrectly describe embryonic stem cell research, but also, he
intentionally misleads his audience when he said, "No fetuses are
created, none destroyed" during the SCNT procedure.
Well, of course, cloning doesn't create fetuses. What cloning it does
do is create new human embryos through asexual means. Once in
existence, these embryos develop in the same manner as natural
embryos.
Whether created through fertilization or cloning, the human embryonic
stage of development lasts from the moment the embryo comes into being
as a one-celled organism, through he eighth week. Thus, for cloning to
create a fetus, the unborn child would have to come into existence
already eight weeks along in development; clearly a preposterous
notion. Thus, Reagan's clearly intended to misinform his audience
toward the end of convincing them to support federal funding for human
cloning research.
California's Proposition 71: The California Stem Cell Research and
Cures Act, which will appear on the November California ballot, claims
to create a state constitutional right to conduct "stem cell
research." In order to hide its radical nature, the initiative never
once uses the word embryo, referring to them merely as "surplus
products of in vitro fertilization treatments." Nor does the
initiative mention embryonic stem cells. They are instead called
"pluripotent stem cells."
As to cloning, it mentions research on pluripotent stem cells that
"may be derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer," thereby hiding
from voters both that the stem cells would be taken from cloned
embryos and that these nascent human lives would be destroyed in the
process. The initiative does mention cloning, but true to form, only
in connection with reproduction, thereby creating a false dichotomy
between so-called reproductive cloning and SCNT, when the procedure is
identical regardless of the use to which the cloned embryo is put.
The UK is moving full speed ahead into cloning research, a truly
deplorable turn of events. But at least in the UK, the cloning lobby
admits what it is doing. That is more than we can say about most
cloning advocates in this country who are working overtime to prevent
the American people from finding out what's really up.
Award winning author Wesley J. Smith is a senior fellow at the
Discovery Institute and a special consultant to the Center for
Bioethics and Culture. His book Consumer's Guide to a Brave New World
will be published in October.
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list