[Paleopsych] Robin Hanson: The Next Really Big Enormous Thing
shovland at mindspring.com
Thu Oct 14 19:28:31 UTC 2004
What's your candidate for the s-curve that comes
after the oil curve?
From: David McFadzean [SMTP:david_mcfadzean at hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 9:07 AM
To: The new improved paleopsych list
Subject: Re: [Paleopsych] Robin Hanson: The Next Really Big Enormous Thing
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Hovland" <shovland at mindspring.com>
To: "'The new improved paleopsych list'" <paleopsych at paleopsych.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Paleopsych] Robin Hanson: The Next Really Big Enormous Thing
> I think there are some errors of fact in this essay.
> He talks about increases in the size of animals.
> We know that a long time ago there were many
> animals that were larger than anything that lives
> today. This points to a collapse phenomenon
> that turned back progress dramatically.
Not true. The blue whale is the largest animal that has ever lived.
> Is there any evidence that human brains are
> increasing in size? It should be possible to
> measure it from decade to decade if it is
> actually happening.
Hanson didn't claim that human brain size is increasing, and certainly not
at a rate that would be measurable from decade to decade.
> In terms of economic progress, we know that
> in spite of the good life in first world countries,
> much of the world's population lives in material
> poverty. Our ability to distribute the output
> of industry has not growth exponentially.
There is an endless list of metrics that are not growing exponentially. How
is this relevant?
> At the moment we are all waking up to the
> reality of Peak Oil.
Pointing out that the current S-curve is flattening in no way shows that a
higher S-curve is impossible.
paleopsych mailing list
paleopsych at paleopsych.org
More information about the paleopsych