[Paleopsych] Economist: The neurology of consciousness: Crick's last stand
Premise Checker
checker at panix.com
Sun Aug 7 02:07:43 UTC 2005
The neurology of consciousness: Crick's last stand
http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=4221513
Jul 28th 2005
Francis Crick suggests where to find the seat of consciousness
IT IS traditional to begin an article about Francis Crick by quoting his
collaborator, James Watson, who wrote, I have never seen Francis Crick in a
modest mood. The immodesty that carried Crick to the discovery of the
structure of DNA in 1953 clearly never left him. His latest paper (and his
last, for he died in 2004) proposes to explain, of all things, the neurological
basis of human consciousness.
Mechanistic explanations of consciousness are hard to come by because
consciousness is so poorly understood. Indeed, it is one of the few unexplained
phenomena that are genuinely mysterious rather than merely problematical. But
Crick, together with his long-time collaborator Christof Koch, of the
California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, focused on a part of the
mystery that seems tractable. This is the integrated nature of conscious
sensation.
As the two researchers put it in their paper, which was published this week in
the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, When holding a rose, you
smell its fragrance and see its red petals while feeling its textured stem with
your fingers.
The part of the brain that caught the two researchers' interest is the
claustrum, a thin sheet of grey matter that lies concealed beneath part of the
cortex (the outer covering of the brain that carries out the computations
involved in seeing, hearing and language).
The key to the researchers' claim is that most, if not all, regions of the
cortex have two-way connections to the claustrum, as do the structures involved
in emotion. It is plausible that the smell, the colour and the texture of the
rose, all processed in different parts of the cortex, could be bound together
into one cohesive, conscious experience by the claustrum. The authors liken it
to a conductor who synchronises and co-ordinates various parts into a united
whole.
Thus far, this is mere anatomical speculation fuelled by the fact that very
little is known about what the claustrum actually does. Crick hoped that his
final paper would inspire researchers to begin to develop molecular techniques
to disable the claustrum in animals to observe the aftermath. Time will tell
whether Crick's spectacular contribution to understanding genetics will be
replicated in the sphere of consciousness.
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list