[Paleopsych] Re: paleopsych Digest, Vol 9, Issue 20
Lynn D. Johnson, Ph.D.
ljohnson at solution-consulting.com
Wed Feb 23 04:14:10 UTC 2005
Misstatement - more people are _married_ in red states; in blu states
they just live together, so 'divorces' aren't recorded.
Steve Hovland wrote:
>I hear the divorce rate in the red states is
>higher than the blue states :-)
>
>
>
>Steve Hovland
>www.stevehovland.net
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: G. Reinhart-Waller [SMTP:waluk at earthlink.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 1:43 PM
>To: The new improved paleopsych list
>Subject: Re: [Paleopsych] Re: paleopsych Digest, Vol 9, Issue 20
>
>
>Of interest is that many older people have grave
>concerns about their children having difficulty making
>long-term commitments (see Alice's post below). If
>what Steve says (below) is correct, by advising our
>youths to make political and social commitments, we are
>in effect brainwashing them into grabbing a
>conservative mentality. I wonder if it also follows
>that those without any commitment are those with
>liberal mentality.
>
>Gerry Reinhart-Waller
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Steve Hovland" <shovland at mindspring.com>
>To: "'Alice Andrews'" <andrewsa at newpaltz.edu>; "'The
>new improved paleopsych list'"
><paleopsych at paleopsych.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 3:36 AM
>Subject: RE: [Paleopsych] Re: paleopsych Digest, Vol 9,
>Issue 20
>
>
>
>
>>This also touches on the issue of black-and-white
>>versus shades-of-gray mentalities.
>>
>>The conservative mentality tends to be
>>black-and-white
>>while the liberal mentality is more shades-of-gray.
>>
>>Both sides have problems when carried to the extreme.
>>
>>A conservative can be unbending at a time when it is
>>actually in his self-interest to be flexible, and a
>>liberal
>>can be unable to commit to a course of action when
>>that is required.
>>
>>Steve Hovland
>>www.stevehovland.net
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alice Andrews [SMTP:andrewsa at newpaltz.edu]
>>Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 8:31 PM
>>To: The new improved paleopsych list
>>Subject: Re: [Paleopsych] Re: paleopsych Digest, Vol
>>9, Issue 20
>>
>>Hi Gerry,
>>Randy Nesse edited a book called "Evolution and the
>>Capacity for
>>Commitment"; do you know it? It's wonderful... if you
>>don't. (His
>>'Commitment in the Clinic' chapter is superb, btw.)
>>Anyway, I think the
>>book addresses your question. The word 'commitment'
>>itself addresses the
>>question. We have evolved mechanisms for detecting
>>commitment and for
>>detecting possible defection in others. People who
>>tow the party line, etc.
>>are considered committed. We seek out such people
>>because it is proximately
>>and ultimately adaptive to do so. Befriending,
>>supporting, trusting, etc.
>>the uncommitted would have been-- and still is, a
>>risk (or threat). Such
>>risks could have been very costly over our
>>evolutionary history and can be
>>still today. Of course, sometimes such risks (siding
>>with someone who seems
>>to be sitting on the fence, uncommitted, a rebel) can
>>be to one's
>>advantage. But 'ancient-brain' doesn't know this--and
>>probably
>>'statistics-brain' doesn't know this either!
>>Anyway, enough late-night babbling! It's a good book
>>and might answer your
>>question...
>>All best!
>>Alice
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: G. Reinhart-Waller
>> To: The new improved paleopsych list
>> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 9:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Paleopsych] Re: paleopsych Digest, Vol
>>9, Issue 20
>>
>>
>> >> Someone beyond the liberal/conservative
>> dichotomy may be rejected by both sides as a
>>nuisance,
>> a threat to shared assumptions that define a group
>> against another.
>>
>> This is absolutely amazing! Why would any audience
>> reject someone who cannot plop into either the
>>liberal
>> or conservative camp? Please explain the threat you
>> feel is apparent. This I need to hear!
>>
>> Gerry
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> paleopsych mailing list
>> paleopsych at paleopsych.org
>>
>>http://lists.paleopsych.org/mailman/listinfo/paleopsych
>><< File:
>>ATT00002.html >> << File: ATT00003.txt >>
>>_______________________________________________
>>paleopsych mailing list
>>paleopsych at paleopsych.org
>>http://lists.paleopsych.org/mailman/listinfo/paleopsych
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>paleopsych mailing list
>paleopsych at paleopsych.org
>http://lists.paleopsych.org/mailman/listinfo/paleopsych
>_______________________________________________
>paleopsych mailing list
>paleopsych at paleopsych.org
>http://lists.paleopsych.org/mailman/listinfo/paleopsych
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/paleopsych/attachments/20050222/d91b66fe/attachment.html>
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list