[Paleopsych] Fwd: free will--fr. Ted Coons
HowlBloom at aol.com
HowlBloom at aol.com
Thu Jun 2 05:45:49 UTC 2005
In a message dated 6/1/2005 2:47:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, eec1 at nyu.edu
writes:
>Howard, before dealing with the math that a putative "free will" would
>require, I feel there is a paradoxical motivational issue regarding "free
>will" that first needs at least considering (if not clarifying). One of
>the reasons "free will" is an attractive concept is that it liberates us
>from a smothering sense of external control with which determinism
>tyrannizes us. Who among us wouldn't like to throw off the behavior
>chains of causality and "over these prison walls fly"? Yet when asked the
>reasons why we do things, we say "because....," thus, admitting to a
>justifying influence in vast preference to the insanity of doing something
>without reason (the abhorrent equivalent of a motivationless crime, so to
>speak). So the issue, at least psychologically, is: Can we choose without
>being chosen or, if we must be chosen, can we still choose? Perhaps
>entanglement is somehow the answer.....Ted
>
>At 11:19 PM 5/16/2005 -0400, you wrote:
>>This is from a dialog Pavel Kurakin and I are having behind the
>>scenes. I wanted to see what you all thought of it. Howard
>>
>>You know that I'm a quantum skeptic. I believe that our math is
>>primitive. The best math we've been able to conceive to get a handle on
>>quantum particles is probabilistic. Which means it's cloudy. It's
>>filled with multiple choices. But that's the problem of our math, not of
>>the cosmos. With more precise math I think we could make more precise
>>predictions.
>>
>>And with far more flexible math, we could model large-scale things like
>>bio-molecules, big ones, genomes, proteins and their interactions. With
>>a really robust and mature math we could model thought and brains. But
>>that math is many centuries and many perceptual breakthroughs away.
>>
>>As mathematicians, we are still in the early stone age.
>>
>>But what I've said above has a kink I've hidden from view. It implies
>>that there's a math that would model the cosmos in a totally
>>deterministic way. And life is not deterministic. We DO have free
>>will. Free will means multiple choices, doesn't it? And multiple
>>choices are what the Copenhagen School's probabilistic equations are all
about?
>>
>>How could the concept of free will be right and the assumptions behind
>>the equations of Quantum Mechanics be wrong? Good question. Yet I'm
>>certain that we do have free will. And I'm certain that our current
>>quantum concepts are based on the primitive metaphors underlying our
>>existing forms of math. Which means there are other metaphors ahead of
>>us that will make for a more robust math and that will square free will
>>with determinism in some radically new way.
>>
>>Now the question is, what could those new metaphors be?
>>
>>Howard
----------
Howard Bloom
Author of The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition Into the Forces of
History and Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind From The Big Bang to the
21st Century
Visiting Scholar-Graduate Psychology Department, New York University; Core
Faculty Member, The Graduate Institute
www.howardbloom.net
www.bigbangtango.net
Founder: International Paleopsychology Project; founding board member: Epic
of Evolution Society; founding board member, The Darwin Project; founder: The
Big Bang Tango Media Lab; member: New York Academy of Sciences, American
Association for the Advancement of Science, American Psychological Society,
Academy of Political Science, Human Behavior and Evolution Society, International
Society for Human Ethology; advisory board member: Youthactivism.org;
executive editor -- New Paradigm book series.
For information on The International Paleopsychology Project, see:
www.paleopsych.org
for two chapters from
The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition Into the Forces of History,
see www.howardbloom.net/lucifer
For information on Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind from the Big
Bang to the 21st Century, see www.howardbloom.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/paleopsych/attachments/20050602/847ed5f9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Ted Coons <eec1 at nyu.edu>
Subject: HOWARD...for you personally...Ted
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 02:49:24 -0400
Size: 7800
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/paleopsych/attachments/20050602/847ed5f9/attachment.mht>
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list