[Paleopsych] TLS: John Gray: Harlequinade
Premise Checker
checker at panix.com
Wed Jun 15 01:18:50 UTC 2005
John Gray: Harlequinade
The Times Literary Supplement, 3.1.31
http://the-tls.co.uk/archive/story.aspx?story_id=2081292&window_type=print
A CARNIVAL OF REVOLUTION. Central Europe, 1989. Padraic Kenney. 341pp.
Princeton University Press; distributed in the UK by Wiley. £19.95. 0
691 05028 7.
Many explanations of the Communist collapse tend to focus on the
economic failure of state socialism, but - as anyone who visited
Central and Eastern Europe during the Communist period knew - that was
hardly novel. Under central planning, shortage and corruption were
endemic and chronic; one way or another, people in Soviet bloc
countries had learnt to live with them. The economic failings of state
socialism played little role in triggering the regime changes of 1989.
Nor did the emergence of Mikhail Gorbachev. The chief constituency of
the reformist Soviet leader was always in the West. In Russia, his
policies served only to reveal the Soviet system's lack of legitimacy,
even among members of the nomenklatura who benefited most from it,
while in Central and Eastern Europe he was widely perceived as trying
to rescue a regime that was flawed beyond recovery. Though Gorbachev's
unwillingness to sanction the use of repressive force made life easier
for dissident movements, it does not explain the sudden political
meltdown that began in Central Europe at the end of the 1980s.
Part of the problem with conventional academic accounts of Communism
is that they have always relied heavily on official sources. Visiting
scholars could not be sure of getting another visa if they showed
themselves to be too critical of their hosts. As a result, many of the
worst features of the Communist regimes failed to register in the
standard academic literature. As an example, the degradation of the
environment in Russia was rarely mentioned in the voluminous pseudo
discipline of Sovietology, and never in ways that reflected the scale
of the damage that had been done to the natural world and human
health. Yet the Soviet environmental catastrophe was common knowledge
among emigres and dissidents, and - in conjunction with the Chernobyl
disaster -it contributed to the constellation of forces that toppled
Gorbachev and overturned the Soviet regime.
An ingrained deference to authority is poor preparation for
understanding a time of political upheaval. A corresponding poverty of
first-hand experience debars most Western academics from giving any
useful account of the events that transformed Central Europe in 1989.
Against this background, Padraic Kenney's A Carnival of Revolution is
seminal and indispensable. Using his first-hand acquaintance with many
of the key participants in the movements of intellectual and popular
resistance that developed in the late 1980s, including some who remain
little known, Kenney has given us a pioneering oral history of the
"revolution from below" that redrew the political map of Central
Europe. Strikingly well written, A Carnival of Revolution weaves
personal narratives of protest into an illuminating historical
analysis of the changing environment in which a new kind of politics
developed.
In referring to the movements that took shape in countries such as
Poland, East Germany, Slovenia, Czechoslovakia and western Ukraine as
a "carnival" of actors and issues, Kenney seeks to distinguish them
from anything like a conventional political opposition to the
Communist apparatus. For one thing, they were far more pluralistic. As
he observes:
This was not simply a tolerant pluralism of parties and movements, in
which one person might be a socialist and another a conservative, or
one person focused on environmental problems while another worried
about nuclear war. I think of it as internal pluralism: one mixed and
matched identities, and issues, as necessary, depending upon what was
necessary to defeat the Communists. A nationalist pacifist, or a
pro-market green, was not an uncommon species.
Not only were the new movements refreshingly hybrid in their
intellectual outlooks, they were highly innovative in the techniques
of protest they employed.
Groups such as the "Orange Alternative" in Poland used "socialist
surrealism" - painting their faces and wearing elf-like costumes, for
example - in a surprisingly effective campaign of ridicule and
derision against the Communist authorities. Elsewhere in Central
Europe, a ragtag army of punks, hippies, greens and peace campaigners
used techniques of mass protest to set the scene for revolutionary
political change.
Kenney performs an invaluable service in recovering the inspiring
motley of Central European dissidence from the memory hole of history.
At the same time, perhaps inevitably given that he is swimming against
the current, he tends to overestimate the impact of the protest
movement on subsequent political developments in the region. Reading
Kenney, one would scarcely suspect that former Communists had returned
to power in eastern Germany, Hungary and elsewhere. Nor would one
guess that with the passage of time some of the more familiar aspects
of Central European nationalism, such as xenophobia and anti-Semitism,
have revived as significant forces in politics. Kenney is keen to show
that the countries in which oppositional movements were most highly
developed are those that have since done well in combining the
economic transition from state socialism with democratic governance.
There is some truth in this view, but what it misses is the larger
contribution made by the differing histories of the countries of
Communist Europe.
If Poland has done best in handling the problems of transition, one
reason is that the Communist regime in that country never succeeded -
as it very largely did for a time in Hungary and Czechoslovakia - in
destroying civil society. If one looks further back, and considers
countries not included in Kenney's survey, we find that those that
lacked experience of democratic government in the pre Communist period
- such as Romania - are experiencing considerable difficulty in coming
to terms with the dilemmas of post-Communist reconstruction. There is
a lesson here.
By humbling the ruling regimes of Central Europe in 1989, Kenney's
carnival of anti-authoritarian movements achieved a peaceful overthrow
of tyranny on a scale unprecedented in history; but they could not
shift the larger burden of the past.
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list