[Paleopsych] bringing peace

G. Reinhart-Waller waluk at earthlink.net
Sun Mar 13 03:58:32 UTC 2005

Most nations engaged in civil war have at least two 
sides represented....one side is the one agreed upon in 
U.S. as capable of fostering democratic rule. 
Shouldn't the quesion be "how does a country impose 
democracy upon another in which voters have no say?" 
I'm partial to  the concept of democracy and like to 
think that a world in which all countries place their 
votes in a ballot box just might be the next step to 
some sort of world peace.  I'm very pleased to see that 
Spain's Muslim population has issued a fatwa on Osama 
bin Laden.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Christopher" 
<anonymous_animus at yahoo.com>
To: <paleopsych at paleopsych.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 11:27 AM
Subject: [Paleopsych] bringing peace

> Gerry says:
>>>How wrong is it for your own nation to assume a
> leading role in bringing about reasonable peace
> throughout the world?<<
> --Depends on how you go about it.
> Michael
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam 
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> paleopsych mailing list
> paleopsych at paleopsych.org
> http://lists.paleopsych.org/mailman/listinfo/paleopsych

More information about the paleopsych mailing list