[Paleopsych] bringing peace
waluk at earthlink.net
Sun Mar 13 03:58:32 UTC 2005
Most nations engaged in civil war have at least two
sides represented....one side is the one agreed upon in
U.S. as capable of fostering democratic rule.
Shouldn't the quesion be "how does a country impose
democracy upon another in which voters have no say?"
I'm partial to the concept of democracy and like to
think that a world in which all countries place their
votes in a ballot box just might be the next step to
some sort of world peace. I'm very pleased to see that
Spain's Muslim population has issued a fatwa on Osama
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Christopher"
<anonymous_animus at yahoo.com>
To: <paleopsych at paleopsych.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 11:27 AM
Subject: [Paleopsych] bringing peace
> Gerry says:
>>>How wrong is it for your own nation to assume a
> leading role in bringing about reasonable peace
> throughout the world?<<
> --Depends on how you go about it.
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> paleopsych mailing list
> paleopsych at paleopsych.org
More information about the paleopsych