[extropy-chat] Oz newspaper poll on cloning
bpaatsch at bigpond.net.au
Thu Feb 12 02:53:49 UTC 2004
Damien Broderick wrote:
> Typically silly confused array of options:
Not only the options but also the article itself is disappointing.
Every time the media gives these clowns a plug it makes it harder to
get a real discussion on the ethics and science of therapeutic cloning
happening. This is not only the case in the general community its also
the case in the parliament.
If clonaid actually had a clone and did not want to disclose the id of
the parent, it seems that all they would need to do is send two
tissues samples (anonymously would be fine). One tissue sample could
be a large adult nail clipping (from the cloned individual), the other the
placenta from the neonate (alleged clone).
More information about the extropy-chat