Meta: Too far Re: [extropy-chat] Re: Iraq and legality again

[Samantha Atkins]

I find many things objectionable.  Hubert spoke from his heart.  I  
for one understand how he feels.

If it does not need a response then why are you raising it up and  
suggesting a tally?

Personally I am letting a lot ride because it is not worth my energy  
and time to tease apart the in my opinion ridiculous justifications  
for the war or its continuance.  Nor is it worth my time to  
continuously check Mike as he in my opinion often gives  
libertarianism a bad name.   Nor is it worth my time to engage in  
legalistic pissing contests devoid of any real understanding or wisdom.

- samantha


On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:20 PM, Brett Paatsch wrote:

> If anyone is doing a tally of how many people find this particular  
> post
> objectionable then please increment it one for me.
>
> I would not find it so objectionable if some basis was given, but none
> is. It looks like pure irrational fevered hate above a love and peace
> sign off.
>
> Please Stuart, please Mike, do not dignify this with a response, it  
> does
> *not* need one.
>
> Brett Paatsch
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hubert Mania" <humania at t- 
> online.de>
> To: "ExI chat list" <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [extropy-chat] Re: Iraq and legality again
>
>
>
>> Thanx, Dirk and Samantha,
>>
>> for still sticking to your views against this rotten US patriotism of
>> Lorrrey and LaForge and those uglitarian callous
>> caluculations with the deaths of  Iraqui people. Be assured that I am
>> writing 2 or 3 emails a week, but then: I don't hit the send  
>> button anymore.
>> I am too weak now to get screwed up in this stinking pile of shit.
>>
>> Love and peace
>>
>> humania
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo/extropy-chat
>