[extropy-chat] Politics: worthwhile commentary
dirk.bruere at gmail.com
Mon Jan 2 14:58:26 UTC 2006
On 12/31/05, Jeff Davis <jrd1415 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Robert Bradbury <robert.bradbury at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I agree with Dirk, that politics is somewhat
> > different. In part because it
> > is constantly shifting. So unlike a "hard" science
> > it is difficult to
> > establish who the authoritative sources are.
> If one cannot identify "authoritative sources", then
> pursuit of a high-quality data set (to enable a
> high-quality analysis) requires a different approach.
> Get at foundational data and perform your own
> analysis, and/or learn how to "crunch" sources so as
> to be able to extract high-quality data from
> mixed-quality data.
The problem is, such data is called 'news' - and contains similar (though
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat