[extropy-chat] the structure of randomness
thespike at satx.rr.com
Mon Jan 2 23:20:28 UTC 2006
At 05:43 PM 1/2/2006 -0500, gts wrote:
>No stats were given but from his words it seems the result is robust.
>(He is a bit worried about the stretching operation but that can't
>explain the results; it is worrying from a physics perspective though).
I'm more worried about the optional chirality rotation, which seems bogus
without a *lot* of justification.
More information about the extropy-chat