[extropy-chat] Are ancestor simulations immoral? (An attempted survey)

Anne-Marie Taylor femmechakra at yahoo.ca
Fri May 26 03:01:32 UTC 2006


Samantha Atkins <sjatkins at mac.com> wrote:    On May 25, 2006, at 10:22 AM, A B wrote:

> Although I was completely sincere in everything I wrote in my last 
> post on this thread, I realize that it may have come across as 
> excessively morbid. I did not mean to put a damper on this 
> particular topic; perhaps I can rephrase my position on this.
>
> My vision of the Singularity has been where the whole purpose of 
> the Singularity is to bring more "Goodness" to this blindly cruel 
> and indifferent Universe. If the Singularity is not about bringing 
> universal joy, love, compassion, and beauty to this dead Universe, 
> then *what* is its purpose? Does the Singularity boil down to a 
> frenzied power struggle? Where the "winner" is rightfully entitled 
> to do *anything* ve wishes in the name of "Freedom", with zero 
> regard for morality? A struggle where the primary deciding factor 
> is purely blind luck - being at the right place at the right time? 
> I'm sorry, but that's a really f****d up reason for pursuing the 
> Singularity.

Samantha wrote:
  It is about bringing more intelligence and greater possibilities to 
this corner of the universe. Whether it achieves or can achieve a 
bunch of utopian universals or not does not gate whether it is 
desirable. I do not know and rather doubt whether such a list as 
"universal joy, love, compassion, beauty" is even well defined much 
less achievable. It is not utter perfect utopia or total 
dystopia. The actuality is likely to be more complex and 
multifarious than that.

  Anna wrote:
  >>Then you have no idea what utopia is.  I'm sorry to hear that.
  >>Just an opinion.
  
A B wrote:
  > If we believe that someone in the future should be allowed to do 
> absolutely *anything*, then we should allow someone in the future 
> to trigger an existential disaster that ends all life, in the name 
> of "Freedom". Note: I am not at all advocating this action, I'm 
> just pointing out a glaring contradiction within this particular 
> philosophy.
   
  Samantha wrote:
  It is not a contradiction. Freedom includes the possibility to 
really screw up.
   
  Anna wrote: A really good point
  
AB wrotre:
> What exactly is the quality that makes a "simulated" being of lower 
> value and importance than a "real" being? Both are comprised of 
> hardware and software, and they both exist at the "real" layer of 
> "reality". One is simply a slave and the other a master. Does a 
> "real" being have some mystical birthright that gives it absolute 
> authority over a newly created "simulated" being? No. One being was 
> simply lucky (and born early) and the other being was simply very 
> misfortunate (and born late).

Samantha wrote:
  Then you don't play violent video games? At what level of 
complexity of software based characters would you stop playing or 
outlaw the games? The actual questions are much more complex than 
just saying "no suffering allowed" in created realities. As I have 
argued there will be suffering in any reality containing autonomous 
beings. We agree on not inflicting suffering as in torture and so on.

  >>Anna wrote:
  >>No I don't.  I don't play games.  Reality is reality and virtual reality 
  >>is virtual reality.  Two different causes.  
   
  AB Wrote:
  > This would basically be the same result as if today, half the 
> world's population rounded up the other half and proceeded to 
> torture them mercilessly. The difference would be that in the 
> future, the victims of torture could be made to never die, and 
> instead endure terrible pain for all eternity (or for at least as 
> long as the Universe exists).

Samantha:
  This is a straw man that was not advocated.
I agree - Anna

_______________________________________________
extropy-chat mailing list
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat



				
---------------------------------
Make free worldwide PC-to-PC calls. Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger with Voice
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20060525/dfa8408b/attachment.html>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list