[extropy-chat] Still confused:)
sjatkins at mac.com
Sun Sep 3 23:49:49 UTC 2006
On Sep 1, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Giu1i0 Pri5c0 wrote:
>> Why? Because this is the native language of the majority of people
>> that we want to reach.
> Could that be religious?
Define please. I don't see why a shift of language modality is or is
likely to be religious.
> If I phrase my own transhumanist beliefs in a religious framework,
> I end up with something like the following (feel free to copy it):
> "If we are God's children, I believe we should grow up. If there
> are no gods (yet), I believe we should try to fill that void."
I have been asking "What happens when the 'children of God' grow up?"
since I was 10. The question is usually not taken kindly much less
pondered. Religions largely don't seem to be about any real
exploration or truth seeking, oddly enough.
> Yeah, I realize that might not actually help much to convince
> the masses :)
Increasingly I believe the masses are irrelevant and the attempt to
convince them is an utter waste of precious time and resources. I do
not like this conclusion of mine but that doesn't entitle me to reject
> What is important? What you want to be true, or what is true?
Importance may only be assessed in a context of values, possibilities
and so on. What we want is part of "what is true". Please clarify
what you wanted to ask.
More information about the extropy-chat