[extropy-chat] Existential risks and CERN
avantguardian2020 at yahoo.com
Sat Sep 16 06:59:26 UTC 2006
I must agree with Dr. Cox in this instance. My
confidence comes from the "oh my God particle". A
cosmic ray proton that was measured as having the
kinetic energy of a major league baseball pitch
(deadly force from a single proton? - AMAZING). If
individual protons that have the relativistic mass
(due to sheer velocity) of a major league baseball
fastball don't pose a threat, it will be a while
before I start to worry about the danger of CERN and
other particle accelerators. Of course that being
said, I wouldn't want to be hit by one, but even if I
were, I am rather certain that you all would be safe.
--- Olie Lamb <neomorphy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just came across an actual figure for the
> existential risk posed by
> experiments at the Large Hadron Collider:
> Dr Cox dismissed worries that by adventuring into
> the unknown and creating
> tiny black holes, the machine could even destroy the
> "The probability is at the level of 10 to the minus
> 40," he said.
> With that number, against the probability of other
> existential risks (eg:
> Gamma-Ut Ray Mi Burst), the risk is negligible
> against the noise.
> Question is: are these the real chances, or are they
> skewed by cognitive
> > _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
alt email: stuart"AT"ucla.edu
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us
with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the extropy-chat