[ExI] free-will, determinism, crime and punishment
gts
gts_2000 at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 21 15:37:49 UTC 2007
Lee,
"A man can surely do what he wills to do, but he cannot determine what he
wills." -Schopenhauer
Schopenhauer's remark is consistent with compatibilism.
The criminal did freely what he willed to do, and in this sense he had
free-will. Nobody held a gun to his head. But it does not follow that he
could have willed to do other than what he in fact willed to do.
As such he should be incarcerated for what he did according to his
criminal nature (a nature which is in need of rehabilitation), but he
should not be condemned further on the grounds that he willed to do wrong
when he could have willed to do right. There is no evidence to prove that
he could have willed to do right. As far as anyone knows, his will to
commit the crime was a function of his criminal nature and determined by
it.
-gts
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list