[ExI] Religions and violence
Dan
dan_ust at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 12 17:17:53 UTC 2010
Well, the problem comes down to specifics and the contradictions even in the New
Testament. Looking at the Gospels, or the rest of it, does not give a clear
picture of what's rejected from the Old Testament -- save for divorce (if
there's anything that's clear, Jesus as depicted in the Gospels, didn't like
divorce and rejected that; the Gospels are silent on gays and no mention is made
at all of abortion).
Regards,
Dan
----- Original Message ----
From: Max More <max at maxmore.com>
To: Extropy-Chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
Sent: Thu, August 12, 2010 11:15:32 AM
Subject: Re: [ExI] Religions and violence
Dan:
> (You
> completely left out Judaism and the fact that Christians generally accept the
> Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) as canonical.
As I understand it, Jesus brought a new dispensation, rendering the moral
imperatives in the barbaric Old Testament obsolete. The "factual" history may
still be accepted as Canonical, at least by fundamentalists (who are the
minority and not "Christians generally"), but even fundies need not accept the
O.T. moral commands without question. They (and to a lesser degree less literal
Christians) continue to accept those of the O.T. moral commands (especially the
Ten Commandments) when they find them suitable or convenient.
When a fundamentalist Christian says that "God hates homos", they are ignoring
their own doctrine of Christ's new dispensation. They typically also ignore the
equally real injunctions to kill those homos (thank the Lord!). They manage to
be inconsistent in their inconsistency.
Max
_______________________________________________
extropy-chat mailing list
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list