[ExI] few bits per second

Ross Evans ross.evans11 at gmail.com
Sat Jun 26 23:53:47 UTC 2010

2010/6/27 Will Steinberg <steinberg.will at gmail.com>

> I dare Ross to possibilify the wonders of conscious perception without
> sounding like a quack.
> Maybe it's just 22nd century science... ;)
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
It's quite simple, for 'quack' is a label attached to to those that peddle
theories with no credible evidence. What Penrose has done is exactly the
kind of nonsense you likely criticise the faith based for doing; filling in
gaps in knowledge with vaguely defined supernatural agency. Having read his
work, and that of other people promoting this theory, there is a distinct
whiff of religious fervour, and an appeal to human exceptionalism.  I think
this quote from Stenger sums it up nicely...

*But, alas, quantum consciousness has about as much substance as the aether
from which it is composed *-V J Stenger


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20100627/0647d6e4/attachment.html>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list