[ExI] satanist ethics, was: names in subject lines... was: something else before that
stefano.vaj at gmail.com
Fri Nov 2 10:27:08 UTC 2012
On 31 October 2012 20:45, BillK <pharos at gmail.com> wrote:
> Whether you are religious or atheist is not relevant to bad social
My point was more limited than Spike's.
Definitions of "bad" do vary, but of course the efficiency of a group is
defined by some basic loyalty parameters *which do not depend on its
We took the satanist exemple, but to be more specific to the discussion at
thand: even in a gang of thieves you are expected not to appropriate the
group's resources for your private use.
You do, you may be forgiven or understood depending the circumstances, but
certainly the theft perpertrated is not acceptable per se.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat