[ExI] <nettime> Forced Exposure: Groklaw closes down
Stephen Van Sickle
sjv2006 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 26 19:34:32 UTC 2013
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Anders Sandberg <anders at aleph.se> wrote.
> Uncensorable seems to imply a broadcast model, even if there is just a
> single recipient. Lots of bandwidth usage. Tamper-proof likely requires
> cryptographic protocols, and hence stable nyms. Invisibility requires using
> "normal" protocols or encryption good enough to hide inside other
> communications, or an entirely separate system.
And what has the large bandwidth in which your darknet can hide? Porn, of
course. I hereby predict that in the near future, open internet traffic
will asymptotically approach 100% pornography. All porn, all the time. It
might even become a formal layer in the protocol stack. You heard it here
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat