[ExI] woohoo! bezos does it again!
William Flynn Wallace
foozler83 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 16:23:42 UTC 2016
We can call the session an ecnaés, with the nifty derivative prime mark
over the é. Is the word ecnaés already taken?
Bumper sticker: DAM (mothers against dyslexia)
Maybe your wife is dyslexic: ecnaes unscrambles to: seneca, encase, and
seance, perfectly good words.
bill w
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:03 PM, spike <spike66 at att.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* extropy-chat [mailto:extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org] *On
> Behalf Of *William Flynn Wallace
> *…*
>
>
>
> >…A great example of lack of social thinking: I meant to send this to
> Spike only and not rouse the herd, but it's OK…
>
>
>
> Eh, there’s no point having a herd if we don’t rouse them regularly.
>
>
>
> >… (BTW - psychopaths are not insane - until you've heard an insane
> person speak, you have not lived a full life - neologisms, interspersed
> with giggling and - oh, wait - doesn't that sound like Spike?) bill w
>
>
>
> Well there ya go. I prefer to think of myself more as one who thinks of
> funny ideas in the middle of a sentence, which then causes them to be
> interspersed with giggling, which is a completely different phenom than
> psychopathic maniacal laughter. In the latter case, it might be another
> personality telling jokes and wisecracks as one speaks.
>
>
>
> Example, we have heard in the old days of demon possession, and in some
> cases multiple demons, such as recorded in judeo-christian scripture, the
> whole legion thing with the two guys at Gadarenes as recorded in Matthew 8:
> 28-32. Now I don’t know about you, but if some yahoo came along, roused my
> swine herd and made pig soup out of my livestock, I would really be
> pissed. They claimed this cat was without sin? How the hell would we
> define hijacking the local swine herd? A misdemeanor?
>
>
>
> But I digress. The point is we have examples aplenty of demon possession,
> and we are told that demons are the counterparts of the angels, the third
> of them who went bad, over to the dark side, etc. So… why the asymmetry?
> Why don’t the good angels ever possess people? Think about it, that might
> be a kick! The good angels have had all this time to learn stuff, then
> they could possess us, and we might become instant skilled programmers or
> something, heeeehehehehheeee. Perhaps that was what was going on when the
> apostles started speaking in tongues, ja? But that’s boring: we have
> computers which can do that now. I want to program in fingers.
>
>
>
> The previous is a funny thought with giggling interspersed with typing.
> So now all I need is a neologism to meet and exceed BillW’s educated
> definition of insane. Hmmmm…. OK got it. I want to go to a reverse
> séance, conjure up some good angels, see if I can be possessed by one. Or
> several of them, like the porcine Legion team, but their counterparts, the
> good guys, ja? We can call the session an ecnaés, with the nifty
> derivative prime mark over the é. Is the word ecnaés already taken? My
> bride uses it regularly in scrabble, but that’s no indication it is an
> actual word: she cheats. {8-[ At scrabble only, not marital vows. {8^D
> As far as I know. {8-/
>
>
>
> But wait, what if… I get possessed by several really stupid angels? They
> could be the Celebrity Apprentice audience of angelic hosts,
> heeeeeheheheheheheeeeeheheheee. This could be a risky ecnaés.
>
>
>
> Is that cool with Bezos sticking that landing, or what?
>
>
>
> spike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20160405/d4b32313/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list