[ExI] Breakthrough Starshot - To The Stars!

Rafal Smigrodzki rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com
Thu Apr 14 19:40:28 UTC 2016


On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Adrian Tymes <atymes at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> If they're honest, they may even find that anything that requires activity
> - even just keeping active a beamed energy source - for 20 years requires
> more infrastructure and commitment than they are willing to provide (or
> profitability - since pride and other incentives won't last nearly long
> enough - which it won't provide).
>
### Why would they need the beam on for 20 years? The proposal calls for a
boost phase lasting only a few hours, after launching a sufficient number
of probes the facility can be dismantled.

Rafał
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20160414/72104e9c/attachment.html>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list