[ExI] freedom threatened
danust2012 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 19 01:32:30 UTC 2016
On Dec 18, 2016, at 5:11 PM, John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 Dan TheBookMan <danust2012 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > you often claimed to be a libertarian here
> I do indeed.
>> > I'm wondering if to you you believe that being a libertarian is compatible with the state deciding what's fake news.
> Then wonder no longer, I do not believe being a libertarian is compatible with the state deciding what's fake news.
Then are you going my to criticize Clinton and many Democrats for advocating that the state decide what's fake news?
>> > Thanks once more for your fake news approach to editing my responses.
> Editing your response? What the hell are you talking about?
You've done it again. Trimming out relevant portions of my response, which makes me wonder if you're doing that to make it look as if I didn't respond to those points. For instance, I dedicated part of my post to a link where Clinton openly supported the legislation we're discussing. (That's important and relevant to your darker comments because the legislation is not a Trump innovation.)
Sample my Kindle books via:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat