[ExI] privacy again

Stephen Van Sickle sjv2006 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 4 04:04:00 UTC 2016


On Mar 2, 2016 09:49, "spike" <spike66 at att.net> wrote:

> There is a big case in the US courts about a newscaster who had a nude
video taken of her by a stalker who removed the peephole in the door.

Did the miscreant remove the peephole (which can arguable not have been
anticipated by the hotel) or did he use a "reverse peephole" such as this:

http://www.amazon.com/Universal-Enforcement-Reverse-Peephole-Viewer/dp/B0036VJ3J4

If the later, these are so available and cheap that not installing a
peephole with a cover:

http://www.amazon.com/Tg3828PH-220-degree-Privacy-Thickness-Polished/dp/B00T415N8A/ref=sr_1_3?s=hi&ie=UTF8&qid=1457064088&sr=1-3&keywords=Door+peephole+cover

could well be negligence.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20160303/030bdbdb/attachment.html>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list