[ExI] privacy again

[Adrian Tymes]

On Mar 10, 2016 10:02 AM, "PJ Manney" <pjmanney at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you actually RESEARCHED THE CASE, Marriott was sued because they not
only told the perpetrator which room Erin Andrews was staying in, they
allowed him to book the adjoining room, so he could monitor her. It had
little to do with peephole technology or other ways of invading the room.
They broke their own privacy policies at the front desk, and facilitated a
stalker causing her great pain and career trauma.

Thanks for the follow up.  This case was indeed not seemed worthy of
research: it does not affect us or anyone we know of.  If the hotel did
actively help the stalker, rather than passively and ignorantly allow as
had previously been stated, then yes they deserved to lose every penny of
that judgment, and more.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20160310/c8fcf42e/attachment.html>