[ExI] privacy again
William Flynn Wallace
foozler83 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 11 01:14:47 UTC 2016
I have been a feminist since the 1970s, so you have my support in full.
But it actually doesn't matter that it was a woman. Privacy should be
respected no matter whom is involved. I am no historian but I think
privacy was a huge battle in the 1770s and later as our government was put
together, and the strict privacy people lost.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:04 PM, PJ Manney <pjmanney at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Adrian Tymes <atymes at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for the follow up. This case was indeed not seemed worthy of
>> research: it does not affect us or anyone we know of. If the hotel did
>> actively help the stalker, rather than passively and ignorantly allow as
>> had previously been stated, then yes they deserved to lose every penny of
>> that judgment, and more.
> On the contrary: it does not only affect famous women. That was the point.
> It affects 50% of the population and I'm sure you know quite a few women
> who have been stalked. In fact, almost every adult woman by a certain age
> has been, whether for short times as they are followed through the streets
> or buildings, or for longer times, via communication and technology. Read
> the comments on the second article. You will find women in every walk of
> life commenting on how they were stalked while traveling for business, like
> Andrews. Or just by living every day, surrounded by men without empathy or
> boundaries. There are more of them than people think.
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat