[ExI] Cold fusion

William Flynn Wallace foozler83 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 11 16:09:49 UTC 2019


In other words  "please keep our grants going"

bill w

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:50 AM Dan TheBookMan <danust2012 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> While I’m skeptical of the original cold fusion claim, the Nature piece
> also had:
>
> “Nonetheless, a by-product of our investigations has been to provide new
> insights into highly hydrided metals and low-energy nuclear reactions, and
> we contend that there remains much interesting science to be done in this
> underexplored parameter space.”
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>    Sample my Kindle books at:
>
> http://author.to/DanUst
>
> On Jun 11, 2019, at 4:59 AM, John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Bizarrely Google just announce in Nature the results of a secret 4 year
> $10,000,000 experimental investigation of cold fusion. Their bottom line
> conclusion:
> "We have yet to yield any evidence of such an effect".
>
> Revisiting the cold case of cold fusion
> <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1256-6>
>
> John K Clark
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20190611/8979fa7b/attachment.htm>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list