[ExI] Cold fusion

Dan TheBookMan danust2012 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 11 16:21:26 UTC 2019


Yeah, it seems like a boiler plate sentence too.

Regards,

Dan
   Sample my Kindle books at:
http://author.to/DanUst

> On Jun 11, 2019, at 9:09 AM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> In other words  "please keep our grants going"
> 
> bill w
> 
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:50 AM Dan TheBookMan <danust2012 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> While I’m skeptical of the original cold fusion claim, the Nature piece also had:
>> 
>> “Nonetheless, a by-product of our investigations has been to provide new insights into highly hydrided metals and low-energy nuclear reactions, and we contend that there remains much interesting science to be done in this underexplored parameter space.” 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Dan
>>    Sample my Kindle books at:
>> http://author.to/DanUst
>> 
>>> On Jun 11, 2019, at 4:59 AM, John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Bizarrely Google just announce in Nature the results of a secret 4 year $10,000,000 experimental investigation of cold fusion. Their bottom line conclusion:
>>> "We have yet to yield any evidence of such an effect".
>>> 
>>> Revisiting the cold case of cold fusion
>>> 
>>> John K Clark
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20190611/93e141e4/attachment.htm>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list