[ExI] the science might be wrong

William Flynn Wallace foozler83 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 24 12:08:44 UTC 2020


Here is what I think:

All businesses stay open, but limit the number of customers and maintain
distances and require masks for all. Plenty of places have done this with
no infections, is what I read.  It is irrefutable that big meetings in
churches or wherever that do not follow these guidelines have been
spreaders and superspreaders.  Correct me if I am wrong.  bill w

On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 6:01 AM Rafal Smigrodzki via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 1:50 PM Stathis Papaioannou via extropy-chat <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> OK, not certain, but very likely. Previous SARS outbreaks have been
>> contained and eliminated because they were localised and it was possible to
>> do this. It’s not possible to do it with the current pandemic given that
>> the virus has spread throughout the world. In Australia it had effectively
>> been eliminated (no infections and no active cases for months) but has
>> taken off again via cases from travellers in quarantine.
>>
>
> ### SARS was not genetically modified to be highly contagious which is why
> it petered out mostly on its own. The case of Australia indeed shows the
> futility of lockdowns in a global economy.
>
> Rafal
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20201224/13931610/attachment.htm>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list