[ExI] teachers

efc at swisscows.email efc at swisscows.email
Sun Aug 27 18:06:54 UTC 2023


Thank you Jason. Would you disagree with me if I call that absense of 
strict empirical proof?

I'm not a fan of anthropic considerations and probabilities for 
multiverses, gods, unicorns and items generally outside of the realm of 
physical science.

I think those kind of discussions sometimes let our imaginations run away 
with ourselves, and even if they indicate something, I will never know, 
and it will never affect me, so as far as I am concerned, I can disregard 
it.

Best regards,
Daniel


On Sun, 27 Aug 2023, Jason Resch via extropy-chat wrote:

> 
> 
> On Saturday, August 26, 2023, efc--- via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>       Hello Stuart,
>
>       Just a quick question from someone not very knowledgeable of cutting
>       edge physics.
>
>       You say that
>
>             that a copy of you can truly be you, then you can relax because you are already immortal. You don't need to
>             copy yourself because there are already plenty of, if not infinite numbers of, you strewn about the
>             multiverse.
> 
>
>       What I wonder is, are infinite numbers of you and multiverses supported by proof or is itone of many interpretations of
>       current theories?
> 
> 
> Anthropic considerations provide strong evidence, in the sense that the probability there's only one universe (with one kind of
> physics) is on the order of 1 in 10^122.
> 
> https://alwaysasking.com/is-the-universe-fine-tuned/
> 
> This is as close to proof as anything science can provide.
> 
> Jason 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>
>       Best regards, Daniel
> 
>
>             Stuart LaForge
> 
>
>                   This is a crucial point, for those of us interested in uploading, so I think we should really
>                   understand it, yet it makes no sense to me. Would you please explain further?
>
>                   Could you also please explain the comment about continuity and not-discontinuity not being the
>                   same thing?
>
>                   Ben
>                   _______________________________________________
>                   extropy-chat mailing list
>                   extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>                   http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             extropy-chat mailing list
>             extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>             http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
> 
> 
>
>       _______________________________________________
>       extropy-chat mailing list
>       extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>       http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
> 
> 
>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list